{"id":3017,"date":"2026-11-13T16:47:32","date_gmt":"2026-11-13T15:47:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/example.invalid\/?p=3017"},"modified":"2026-11-13T23:34:50","modified_gmt":"2026-11-13T22:34:50","slug":"navire-redelivre-saisie-dette-ancien-affreteur-cassation-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/abdennour-avocat.fr\/en\/navire-redelivre-saisie-dette-ancien-affreteur-cassation-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Arresting a ship for a former charterer\u2019s debt: is it still possible?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p data-pm-slice=\"1 1 []\">A claim arose during a charter, but the ship has since been redelivered to its owner. Can the creditor still arrest it where the debtor does not own the vessel?<\/p>\n<p>The answer depends in particular on whether there is a <strong>right to follow the vessel<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<h2>Redelivery changes the position<\/h2>\n<p>In a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/691d844802bad2f30af4095b\">judgment of 19 November 2025<\/a>, the French Court of Cassation considered a claim for bunkers ordered by a charterer.<\/p>\n<p>The ship had then been redelivered to its owner before the supplier sought arrest.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/jorf\/id\/JORFTEXT000000853189\">Brussels Convention of 10 May 1952<\/a> allows the ship to which a maritime claim relates to be arrested in certain cases where the charterer alone is liable for that claim.<\/p>\n<p>The Court held, however, that once the vessel is <strong>redelivered<\/strong>, that possibility generally disappears.<\/p>\n<h2>A maritime claim does not necessarily follow the vessel<\/h2>\n<p>This is where the distinction becomes essential.<\/p>\n<p>A claim\u2019s classification as a \u201cmaritime claim\u201d under the 1952 Convention may support an application for arrest. It does not mean that the claim always follows the vessel into the owner\u2019s hands.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/jorf\/id\/JORFTEXT000000853189\">Article 9 of the Convention<\/a> states that the Convention does not itself create a right to follow the vessel that would not otherwise exist under the applicable law.<\/p>\n<p>The French Court of Cassation concluded that, where the ship was redelivered before arrest was sought, arrest is possible only if the maritime claim is secured by a <strong>maritime lien that follows the vessel<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>It is then necessary to establish whether the claim falls, in particular, within the privileged categories under <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000027723869\">Article L. 5114-8 of the French Transport Code<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2>Check the vessel\u2019s status when arrest is sought<\/h2>\n<p>Before making an application, check:<\/p>\n<ul data-spread=\"false\">\n<li>who actually owes the debt;<\/li>\n<li>who operates and owns the ship when arrest is sought;<\/li>\n<li>whether the charter remains in force;<\/li>\n<li>and, following redelivery, whether the claim has a lien allowing the ship to be pursued.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Classification as a maritime claim is therefore not always enough.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Can the ship still lawfully be arrested for the debt when the measure is sought?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Are you considering arresting a ship for a claim arising during a charter, or contesting arrest for a former charterer\u2019s debt? <strong>Contact the firm.<\/strong><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After the charter has ended, a claim against the former charterer does not necessarily permit the arrest of the vessel once it has been returned to its owner.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":3300,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3017","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-droit-maritime"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/abdennour-avocat.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3017","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/abdennour-avocat.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/abdennour-avocat.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abdennour-avocat.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abdennour-avocat.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3017"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/abdennour-avocat.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3017\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3301,"href":"https:\/\/abdennour-avocat.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3017\/revisions\/3301"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abdennour-avocat.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3300"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/abdennour-avocat.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3017"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abdennour-avocat.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3017"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abdennour-avocat.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3017"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}